TickBase Review – Is This Broker a Scam?
The forex industry is full of brokers promising easy profits, tight spreads, and secure trading. But as we’ve seen time and time again, many of them turn out to be nothing more than well-disguised scams. So, what about TickBase? Is this a reliable broker, or is it just another name in a long list of fraudulent platforms?
At first glance, TickBase tries to look like a professional and trustworthy broker. They claim to have been in business since 2003, mention regulatory oversight, and offer various trading options. But when we started digging deeper, we uncovered several red flags—from a suspicious domain history to misleading licensing claims and a total lack of reviews.
These are the kinds of warning signs that experienced traders know should not be ignored. If a broker is lying or hiding something from the start, can they really be trusted with your money? In this review, we’ll break down everything we found about TickBase so you can decide for yourself whether it’s worth the risk.
TickBase – General Broker Information
Below is the key information about TickBase, gathered from our research. However, as you’ll see, a lot of details are missing or suspicious, further raising concerns about this broker.
Category | Details |
Official Website | tickbase.eu |
Established Year | Claims 2003, but domain registered in 2014 |
Regulation | False claim: SEC (not a forex regulator) |
Offshore: M.I.S.A (Comoros, no real oversight) | |
Leverage | No information provided |
Account Types | Open real account, Demo account |
Restricted Countries | USA, Canada, Hong Kong, EEA countries |
Platforms | No information provided |
Trustpilot Score | No reviews available |
Customer Support | Email: [email protected] |
Phone: +44 7539 317530 |
This lack of transparency is not what you’d expect from a legitimate broker. No details about trading conditions, leverage, or platforms? That’s a major red flag. If a broker refuses to provide basic information, what else are they hiding?
TickBase Review – Suspicious Domain History
When our team looked into TickBase, something immediately caught our attention—the domain history. A broker’s credibility often starts with how long they’ve been online, and in this case, things just don’t add up.
TickBase claims to have been established in 2003, but their domain was only registered on December 7, 2014. That’s an 11-year gap. So where was this broker operating before that? If they were truly around since 2003, why didn’t they secure their domain earlier?
This inconsistency is a classic red flag. Reliable brokers don’t wait over a decade to set up an online presence. Instead, this looks like a case where a company is trying to appear more established than it really is. And let’s be real—why would an honest financial firm need to lie about something as simple as their founding date?
The domain age mismatch is often a sign of a rebranded or recycled scam. We’ve seen this tactic before—fraudulent brokers shut down when exposed and later reappear under a new name. Could this be the case with TickBase? Given the lack of solid information about their past, it’s a strong possibility.
If you’re considering investing with them, ask yourself: do you really want to trust a broker that’s already misleading you from the start?
TickBase Review – Fake or Unreliable Licensing?
One of the first things any trader should check before trusting a broker is its regulatory status. A solid, reputable broker will have a license from respected financial authorities like the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or CySEC (Cyprus). So, what about TickBase? Well, this is where things start looking suspicious.
TickBase claims to be regulated by the SEC. Sounds impressive, right? The problem is that the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) does NOT regulate forex brokers. Their jurisdiction is limited to securities markets in the U.S. but does not extend to forex trading or CFD brokers. So why is TickBase listing the SEC as their regulator? Is it a deliberate attempt to mislead traders?
But it gets worse. The second supposed regulatory body mentioned is M.I.S.A (Mwali International Services Authority). If you haven’t heard of this, don’t worry—you’re not missing much. This is an offshore entity based in Comoros, a tiny island nation known for handing out licenses with almost no oversight. A license from M.I.S.A means absolutely nothing when it comes to client protection.
Think about it: why would a legitimate broker choose a regulator that doesn’t enforce strict financial standards? The answer is simple—they don’t want real oversight. They want a license that looks official but doesn’t actually hold them accountable for anything.
So, what do we have?
- A misleading claim about SEC regulation.
- A worthless offshore license from M.I.S.A.
This combination is a classic warning sign of a scam broker. Real brokers seek real regulation. Scammers look for loopholes. And TickBase seems to be doing exactly that.
TickBase Review – Suspicious or Fake Reviews?
When checking a broker’s reputation, reviews can be a valuable indicator. But only if they are real. So, we decided to dig into TickBase’s feedback on Trustpilot—and what did we find? Nothing.
That’s right. TickBase has no reviews at all. Zero. No positive, no negative—just complete silence. Now, this might not seem like a big deal at first, but let’s think about it critically.
TickBase claims to have been in business since 2003 (which we already exposed as false), yet in all these years, not a single trader has left a review? That’s nearly impossible. Even shady brokers with terrible service at least get complaints from angry customers. But here, we see a complete absence of feedback.
Why is this a red flag?
- Real brokers, even bad ones, have some kind of online presence. The fact that TickBase has nothing suggests reviews may have been deleted or they are actively avoiding publicity to stay under the radar.
- Scam brokers often wipe their reputation clean and rebrand under a new name once their fraud is exposed. Could TickBase be a recycled scam?
- Fake brokers sometimes flood review sites with fake positive reviews, but TickBase hasn’t even done that. This either means they haven’t started the scam yet or are operating in a way that keeps traders from leaving public feedback.
The bottom line? No reviews is just as suspicious as bad reviews. If TickBase were a legitimate broker, traders would be talking about them—good or bad. Instead, we see complete silence, which raises the question: what are they hiding?
TickBase Review – A Broker You Should Avoid
After thoroughly investigating TickBase, the verdict is clear—this is not a broker you should trust with your money. The red flags are too many and too serious to ignore.
- Fake business history – They claim to be around since 2003, but their domain was only registered in 2014. What were they doing for 11 years?
- Misleading regulation – They list the SEC, which doesn’t regulate forex brokers, and M.I.S.A, an offshore entity that provides no real oversight. This means traders have zero protection if anything goes wrong.
- Suspicious lack of reviews – No positive feedback, no complaints, nothing. Either they’ve wiped their past clean, or they’re hiding something big.
When a broker’s story doesn’t match the facts, it’s usually because they’re trying to deceive traders. TickBase fits the classic pattern of a scam—fake credentials, a questionable online presence, and a setup designed to lure in victims while staying under the radar.
If you’re looking for a reliable forex broker, stay far away from TickBase. There are plenty of regulated, transparent, and reputable alternatives that won’t put your funds at risk. The forex market is already risky enough—don’t make it worse by trusting a broker that shows every sign of being a scam.